EUTECNIQ Sciences

See every page on one mapArrow keys move through results · Enter opens · Esc closes

Academy · Course 7 Regulatory requirement Calculators

Dry botanicals stop microbes from growing, yet Salmonella and spores survive in them

This course explains the USP tests behind a botanical's microbial specification, the organisms that slip past them, and the kill steps that lower the risk. It works through spores, acid tolerance, biofilms and cells that are alive but form no colonies, using published data and three calculators.

Level
Intermediate
Reading time
About 30 minutes
Builds on
COA science; Drying and water activity
Tools
3 calculators, 1 growth-window explorer, 1 heat map
6.6%of imported spice shipments carried Salmonella, FY2007–FY2009 (750 g samples)
0.83water activity below which none of FDA’s listed pathogens grows
30.24minutes per tenfold Salmonella kill at 65 °C on dry chili (aw 0.33), against 0.72 at aw 0.97
10grams in which USP ⟨2022⟩ looks for Salmonella; absence in 10 g is not absence in a lot
At a glance

Each pathogen grows only inside its own window of water activity, pH and temperature, so lowering any one of them can stop it

Move the conditions and see which of FDA's fifteen pathogen entries are inside their single-factor growth limitsFDA guidance data

FDA, Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance, Appendix 4, Table A-1 (values in the water activity section table). Each limit was measured with the other factors near optimal; combined stresses narrow the windows, so “inside” is not a prediction of growth.

You will learn

  1. How USP ⟨2021⟩, ⟨2022⟩ and ⟨2023⟩ set and test botanical microbial limits, and how they differ from ⟨61⟩, ⟨62⟩ and ⟨1111⟩.
  2. Why low water activity stops growth but does not sterilize, using FDA growth limits.
  3. Which cells a plate count misses: spores, injured cells, persisters, biofilm cells and viable but nonculturable cells.
  4. How to compute a kill step with D, z and F values, and why dry products need far more heat.
  5. What a plate count and an "absent in 10 g" result can and cannot prove.
  6. How steam, dry heat, irradiation and ethylene oxide compare, with their U.S. rules.
The specification

USP sets botanical limits by how processed the material is, from 10² to 10⁶ cfu/g

The supplement chapters mirror the drug chapters, row by row, with different incubation and recovery rulesUSP text
USP microbiology chapters: dietary-supplement chapters 2021, 2022 and 2023 beside the drug chapters 61, 62 and 1111, row by rowDietary supplements and their ingredientsNonsterile drug productsCount<2021> Microbial enumeration testsTAMC on soybean–casein digest agar, 48–72 h; TYMC onSabouraud dextrose agar, 20–25 °C, 5–7 days. Plates of 30–300colonies. Preparatory test: more than 70% recovery of spikedorganisms.<61> Microbial enumeration testsTAMC 30–35 °C, 3–5 days; TYMC 20–25 °C, 5–7 days. Count platesbelow 250 (TAMC) or 50 (TYMC). Suitability: recovery within afactor of 2.Absence<2022> Absence of specified microorganismsSalmonella, E. coli, S. aureus and Clostridium species, normally in10 g. For Clostridium, one portion is heated to 80 °C for 10 min to killvegetative cells and leave spores.<62> Tests for specified microorganismsBile-tolerant Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli, Salmonella, P.aeruginosa, S. aureus, Clostridia and C. albicans. Salmonella: notless than 10 g.Limits<2023> Microbiological attributesRecommended limits by material, from 102​ (infusions) to 106​ cfu/g(botanicals for boiling water). Used when the monograph sets nolimit.<1111> Acceptance criteriaLimits by route. Nonaqueous oral: TAMC 103​, TYMC 102​, no E. coli in1 g. A criterion of 10n​ means at most 2 × 10n​.USP microbiology chapters for supplements beside the drug chaptersSupplementsDrug productsCount<2021> Microbial enumeration testsTAMC on soybean–casein digest agar, 48–72 h; TYMCon Sabouraud dextrose agar, 20–25 °C, 5–7 days. Platesof 30–300 colonies. Preparatory test: more than 70%recovery of spiked organisms.<61> Microbial enumeration testsTAMC 30–35 °C, 3–5 days; TYMC 20–25 °C, 5–7 days.Count plates below 250 (TAMC) or 50 (TYMC).Suitability: recovery within a factor of 2.Absence<2022> Absence of specified microorganismsSalmonella, E. coli, S. aureus and Clostridium species,normally in 10 g. For Clostridium, one portion is heated to80 °C for 10 min to kill vegetative cells and leave spores.<62> Tests for specified microorganismsBile-tolerant Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli, Salmonella,P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Clostridia and C. albicans.Salmonella: not less than 10 g.Limits<2023> Microbiological attributesRecommended limits by material, from 102​ (infusions) to106​ cfu/g (botanicals for boiling water). Used when themonograph sets no limit.<1111> Acceptance criteriaLimits by route. Nonaqueous oral: TAMC 103​, TYMC 102​,no E. coli in 1 g. A criterion of 10n​ means at most 2 × 10n​.
USP 38–NF 33 (2015): ⟨2021⟩, ⟨2022⟩ and ⟨2023⟩ (Second Supplement, Pharmacopeial Forum 38(2)); ⟨61⟩, ⟨62⟩ and ⟨1111⟩. USP lists 2025 versions of ⟨2021⟩ to ⟨2023⟩, retitled for "Dietary Ingredients and Dietary Supplements"; confirm current text in USP–NF.
Text version of the chapter comparison
  • ⟨2021⟩ TAMC on soybean–casein digest agar, 48–72 h; TYMC on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 20–25 °C for 5–7 days; plates expected to give 30–300 colonies; preparatory testing must show more than 70% recovery of spiked organisms. ⟨61⟩ TAMC at 30–35 °C for 3–5 days; TYMC at 20–25 °C for 5–7 days; counts from plates below 250 (TAMC) or 50 (TYMC); suitability requires recovery within a factor of 2.
  • ⟨2022⟩ Absence of Salmonella, E. coli, S. aureus and Clostridium species, normally in 10 g, with a 25 g retest for doubtful results. For Clostridium, one portion is heated to 80 °C for 10 min. ⟨62⟩ Bile-tolerant Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli, Salmonella, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Clostridia and C. albicans.
  • ⟨2023⟩ Recommended limits by material (next figure), used when the monograph does not specify limits. ⟨1111⟩ Acceptance criteria by route; for nonaqueous oral drugs TAMC 10³, TYMC 10², absence of E. coli in 1 g; a criterion of 10¹ means a maximum acceptable count of 20, 10² means 200, and so forth.
Raw botanicals carry the loosest counts; refined ingredients and infusions the tightestUSP text
USP 2023 recommended limits: total aerobic and total yeast and mold counts by material, on a logarithmic scale, with the specified-organism testsTotal aerobic microbial count (TAMC)Total yeast and mold count (TYMC)Specified organisms1101​102​103​104​105​106​107​Recommended limit, cfu/g or mL (log scale)Botanicals to be treated with boiling waterbefore useBotanicals to be treated with boiling water before use: TAMC not more than 1,000,000 cfu/gBotanicals to be treated with boiling water before use: TYMC not more than 10,000 cfu/g106​104​BTGN ≤ 102​; no E. coli or Salmonella in 10 gDried or powdered botanicalsDried or powdered botanicals: TAMC not more than 100,000 cfu/gDried or powdered botanicals: TYMC not more than 1,000 cfu/g105​103​BTGN ≤ 103​; no Salmonella or E. coli in 10 gPowdered botanical extractsPowdered botanical extracts: TAMC not more than 10,000 cfu/gPowdered botanical extracts: TYMC not more than 1,000 cfu/g104​103​No Salmonella or E. coli in 10 gTincturesTinctures: TAMC not more than 10,000 cfu/gTinctures: TYMC not more than 1,000 cfu/g104​103​None listedFluidextractsFluidextracts: TAMC not more than 10,000 cfu/gFluidextracts: TYMC not more than 1,000 cfu/g104​103​None listedNutritional supplements with botanicalsNutritional supplements with botanicals: TAMC not more than 10,000 cfu/gNutritional supplements with botanicals: TYMC not more than 1,000 cfu/g104​103​No Salmonella or E. coli in 10 gOther raw materials and supplementingredientsOther raw materials and supplement ingredients: TAMC not more than 1,000 cfu/gOther raw materials and supplement ingredients: TYMC not more than 100 cfu/g103​102​No E. coli in 10 gSupplements with synthetic or highly refinedingredientsSupplements with synthetic or highly refined ingredients: TAMC not more than 1,000 cfu/gSupplements with synthetic or highly refined ingredients: TYMC not more than 100 cfu/g103​102​No E. coli in 10 gInfusions and decoctionsInfusions and decoctions: TAMC not more than 100 cfu/gInfusions and decoctions: TYMC not more than 10 cfu/g102​10None listed
BTGN: bile-tolerant Gram-negative bacteria. Limits are "recommended" and apply where a monograph sets none.USP ⟨2023⟩, Tables 2 and 3, as published in USP 38–NF 33 (2015).
Data table: USP ⟨2023⟩ recommended limits (cfu/g or mL)
USP 2023 recommended microbial limits by material
MaterialTAMC, NMTTYMC, NMTOther
Dried or powdered botanicals10⁵10³BTGN NMT 10³; absence of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in 10 g
Powdered botanical extracts10⁴10³Absence of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in 10 g
Tinctures10⁴10³None listed
Fluidextracts10⁴10³None listed
Infusions and decoctions10²10None listed
Nutritional supplements with botanicals10⁴10³Absence of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in 10 g
Botanicals to be treated with boiling water before use10⁶10⁴BTGN NMT 10²; absence of E. coli and Salmonella spp. in 10 g
Other raw materials and dietary supplement ingredients10³10²Absence of E. coli in 10 g
Nutritional supplements with synthetic or highly refined ingredients10³10²Absence of E. coli in 10 g

Source: USP 38–NF 33, ⟨2023⟩ Tables 2 and 3. In USP 35–NF 30 (official May 1, 2012) the boiling-water category read TAMC 10⁵, TYMC 10³ and absence of E. coli in 10 g, so the chapter has changed before; the 2025 version could not be read without a subscription. AHPA's June 2022 comparison lists the same values as USP 38 for dried botanicals, powdered extracts and supplements with botanicals.

Explanation, details and sources

Two counts anchor a typical specification. TAMC is the total aerobic microbial count; TYMC is the total combined yeast and mold count. Both are reported in colony-forming units (cfu) per gram, where one cfu is any cell or clump that grows into a visible colony. Absence tests then look for named pathogens in a stated mass.

The category drives the decision. Reclassifying a raw powder as a powdered extract tightens the TAMC recommendation tenfold, from 10⁵ to 10⁴ cfu/g, while the yeast-and-mold and Salmonella and E. coli recommendations stay the same. A supplier specification that quotes only a count, with no category and no absence tests, is incomplete.

How it is measured

A plate count is meaningful once the method has shown it recovers organisms from that botanical

One 10 g sample feeds three test paths, all gated by a recovery checkSchematic
Microbial test workflow for a botanical powder: method suitability first, then tenfold dilutions to duplicate plates, enrichment for specified organisms, and a heat step that selects Clostridium sporesFirst, prove the method recovers organisms from this botanicalSpike 25–250 cfu of test strains: recovery above 70% in USP <2021>, or within a factor of 2 in USP <61>. If the plant inhibits growth,dilute further or add neutralizers (soy lecithin 0.5%, polysorbate 20 4.0%). FDA BAM: cloves at 1:1000; allspice, cinnamon and oreganoat 1:100; onion and garlic with 0.5% K₂SO₃.10 g sample+ 90 mL diluent= 1:10Count10−1​10−2​10−3​Duplicate platesTAMC: soybean–casein digestagar30–35 °C; 48–72 h in <2021>, 3–5days in <61>TYMC: Sabouraud dextrose agar20–25 °C; 5–7 daysResult in cfu/gMean colonies ÷ grams of sampleon the plate; ‘less than 10 per g’ ifthe 1:10 plates are blankAbsence tests for Salmonella and E. coliPre-enrichmentNonselective broth, 30–35°C, 18–24 h; injured cellsrepairSelective enrichmentRappaport Vassiliadisbroth (Salmonella);MacConkey broth, 42–44°C (E. coli)Selective agarXLD, brilliant green orHektoen; MacConkeyConfirm, or report absentBiochemical confirmation oftypical colonies; result applies tothe mass testedClostridium sporesSplit the 1:10 suspensionTwo equal portionsHeat one portion to 80°C for 10 minVegetative cells die;spores surviveAnaerobic culture, 48 hReinforced clostridialmedium, then ColumbiaagarClostridia present or absentCatalase-negative Gram-positiverodsMicrobial test workflow for a botanical powderFirst, prove the method worksSpike 25–250 cfu; recovery above 70% in USP <2021>,or within a factor of 2 in USP <61>. Dilute further orneutralize (lecithin 0.5%, polysorbate 20 4.0%). FDABAM: cloves 1:1000; allspice, cinnamon, oregano 1:100;onion, garlic with 0.5% K₂SO₃.10 g sample + 90 mL diluent (1:10)Count: tenfold dilutions, duplicate platesTAMC on soybean–casein digest agar, 30–35 °C; TYMCon Sabouraud dextrose agar, 20–25 °C, 5–7 daysResult in cfu/gMean colonies ÷ grams on the plate; ‘less than 10 per g’if 1:10 plates are blankAbsence tests: pre-enrichment → selective broth→ selective agarRappaport Vassiliadis or MacConkey broth; XLD, brilliantgreen, Hektoen or MacConkey agarConfirm or report absentIn the mass tested, usually 10 gClostridium sporesHeat half to 80 °C for 10 min; anaerobic culture 48 h
USP 38–NF 33 ⟨2021⟩, ⟨2022⟩ and ⟨61⟩; FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5, Salmonella, October 2026 edition, section C.10 (spices). Not to scale.
Text version of the workflow
  1. Suitability first. Inoculate 25–250 cfu of challenge strains; ⟨2021⟩ requires more than 70% recovery, ⟨61⟩ a count within a factor of 2 of the control. If the botanical inhibits growth, increase the diluent volume or add inactivators such as soy lecithin 0.5% and polysorbate 20 4.0%. FDA BAM states that "there are no known methods for neutralizing the toxicity" of allspice, cinnamon, cloves and oregano, and examines them at 1:100 (cloves 1:1000). Onion and garlic are pre-enriched with 0.5% K₂SO₃.
  2. Count. Suspend 10 g in diluent to 100 mL (1:10), make tenfold dilutions and plate in duplicate. Report the mean in cfu/g, or "less than 10 per g" when the 1:10 plates are blank.
  3. Absence. Pre-enrich in nonselective broth, transfer to selective broth (Rappaport Vassiliadis for Salmonella; MacConkey broth at 42–44 °C for E. coli), streak selective agar and confirm typical colonies.
  4. Clostridia. Heat one portion to 80 °C for 10 min, culture both portions anaerobically, and look for catalase-negative Gram-positive rods.
Weighted plate count (FDA BAM)cfu/g = Σ NiΣ Vi, Vi = mL plated × 10−k g/mL
Count, FDA BAM weighted method
95% interval from counting error alone
Count, USP ⟨61⟩ plate selection
Against the limit
The four plates and which ones countCalculator

Default counts are FDA BAM Chapter 3 Example 2.1a (144 and 118 colonies at 10⁻², 26 and 20 at 10⁻³), which BAM reports as 14,000 cfu per mL.
Method, assumptions and limits
What it calculates
The concentration of culturable organisms in the sample from colony counts on duplicate plates at two tenfold dilutions, by two published rules, and compares it with a specification.
Equations
FDA BAM maximum-likelihood estimate without too-numerous plates: cfu/g = ΣNi/ΣVi over plates with 15–300 colonies, reported to two significant figures (third digit 5 rounds to even). USP ⟨61⟩: the arithmetic mean of the plates at the dilution with the highest counts below 250 (TAMC) or 50 (TYMC), divided by the grams of sample per plate. The 95% interval uses exact Poisson limits on ΣNi.
Variables and units
Ni colonies on plate i; Vi grams of original sample on plate i; the first dilution 10⁻¹ is the 1:10 suspension of 10 g in 100 mL.
Assumptions
Colonies are Poisson-distributed around the true mean; the method has passed its recovery check; one colony arises from one cfu.
Valid range
0–5,000 colonies per plate. When no plate falls in 15–300, the BAM result is flagged as estimated. When every plate is blank, the result is reported as less than one colony on the least diluted plate.
What it does not establish
It ignores sampling error between containers, which is usually larger than counting error. It counts only culturable cells. Applying the ⟨1111⟩ rule that 10ⁿ means at most 2 × 10ⁿ to a ⟨2023⟩ limit is shown for comparison; the ⟨2023⟩ text we read does not state that rule.
References
FDA BAM Chapter 3 (January 2026 edition); USP 38–NF 33 ⟨61⟩ and ⟨1111⟩.
Verification
An independent Python solution in tests/numerics/ref/academy_microbiology.py (scipy chi-square limits) reproduces the readouts, including BAM Example 2.1a (14,000).
Explanation, details and sources

Some botanicals inhibit the very organisms a test looks for. FDA's method lists allspice, cinnamon, cloves and oregano as toxic to Salmonella in the broth, so the laboratory first spikes known organisms into the sample and proves it recovers them.

Salmonella in spices and botanicals

Salmonella sits in spices at low, patchy levels, so the mass tested decides what a test can find

Retail spices carried far less Salmonella than the same spices at import, consistent with treatment after entryFDA data
Salmonella prevalence in eleven spices: shipments offered for import (750 g tested, FY2012–2015) against retail samples (125 g tested, 2013–2015)At import, 750 g per sample (line: 95% interval)At retail, 125 g per sampleImport → retailPositive / tested0%5%10%15%20%25%30%Samples positive for SalmonellaCoriander, groundCoriander, ground, retail: 3 of 543 positive (0.56%; 95% CI 0.11–1.6%)Coriander, ground, import: 17 of 92 positive (18%; 95% CI 11–28%)18% → 0.56%17/92 · 3/543Red pepper, groundRed pepper, ground, retail: 4 of 633 positive (0.64%; 95% CI 0.17–1.6%)Red pepper, ground, import: 36 of 337 positive (11%; 95% CI 7.6–14%)11% → 0.64%36/337 · 4/633OreganoOregano, retail: 1 of 669 positive (0.15%; 95% CI 0.0038–0.83%)Oregano, import: 8 of 78 positive (10%; 95% CI 4.5–19%)10% → 0.15%8/78 · 1/669CuminCumin, retail: 0 of 549 positive (0%; 95% CI 0.00–0.67%)Cumin, import: 11 of 130 positive (8.5%; 95% CI 4.3–15%)8.5% → 0%11/130 · 0/549Sesame seed, wholeSesame seed, whole, retail: 0 of 526 positive (0%; 95% CI 0.00–0.70%)Sesame seed, whole, import: 12 of 155 positive (7.7%; 95% CI 4.1–13%)7.7% → 0%12/155 · 0/526Black pepperBlack pepper, retail: 3 of 1264 positive (0.24%; 95% CI 0.049–0.69%)Black pepper, import: 15 of 223 positive (6.7%; 95% CI 3.8–11%)6.7% → 0.24%15/223 · 3/1264White pepper, groundWhite pepper, ground, retail: 0 of 588 positive (0%; 95% CI 0.00–0.63%)White pepper, ground, import: 3 of 50 positive (6%; 95% CI 1.3–17%)6.0% → 0%3/50 · 0/588BasilBasil, retail: 1 of 529 positive (0.19%; 95% CI 0.0048–1.1%)Basil, import: 1 of 20 positive (5%; 95% CI 0.13–25%)5.0% → 0.19%1/20 · 1/529Curry powder, groundCurry powder, ground, retail: 1 of 518 positive (0.19%; 95% CI 0.0049–1.1%)Curry powder, ground, import: 7 of 177 positive (4%; 95% CI 1.6–8.0%)4.0% → 0.19%7/177 · 1/518Paprika, groundPaprika, ground, retail: 2 of 816 positive (0.25%; 95% CI 0.030–0.88%)Paprika, ground, import: 3 of 85 positive (3.5%; 95% CI 0.73–10%)3.5% → 0.25%3/85 · 2/816Dehydrated garlic, groundDehydrated garlic, ground, retail: 3 of 615 positive (0.49%; 95% CI 0.10–1.4%)Dehydrated garlic, ground, import: 1 of 59 positive (1.7%; 95% CI 0.043–9.1%)1.7% → 0.49%1/59 · 3/615
Retail samples were smaller (125 g against 750 g), which FDA says likely contributed to the lower prevalence but "cannot fully explain the observations".FDA, Risk Profile: Pathogens and Filth in Spices, 2017 update, Tables 1 and 2 (import FY2012–FY2015; retail November 2013 to March 2015); headline figures from the 2013 draft risk profile, Executive Summary and Table 4.3.
Data table: Salmonella prevalence at import and at retail
Salmonella prevalence in eleven spices at import and retail
SpiceImport positive / testedImport % (95% CI)Retail positive / testedRetail % (95% CI)
Coriander, ground17 / 9218 (11–28)3 / 5430.56 (0.11–1.6)
Red pepper, ground36 / 33711 (7.6–14)4 / 6330.64 (0.17–1.6)
Oregano8 / 7810 (4.5–19)1 / 6690.15 (0.0038–0.83)
Cumin11 / 1308.5 (4.3–15)0 / 5490 (0.00–0.67)
Sesame seed, whole12 / 1557.7 (4.1–13)0 / 5260 (0.00–0.70)
Black pepper15 / 2236.7 (3.8–11)3 / 1,2640.24 (0.049–0.69)
White pepper, ground3 / 506 (1.3–17)0 / 5880 (0.00–0.63)
Basil1 / 205 (0.13–25)1 / 5290.19 (0.0048–1.1)
Curry powder, ground7 / 1774 (1.6–8.0)1 / 5180.19 (0.0049–1.1)
Paprika, ground3 / 853.5 (0.73–10)2 / 8160.25 (0.030–0.88)
Dehydrated garlic, ground1 / 591.7 (0.043–9.1)3 / 6150.49 (0.10–1.4)

FDA 2017 update, Table 1 (retail, 125 g) and Table 2 (import, 750 g). Imports and retail differ significantly for all spices except basil and dehydrated garlic. Spice risk profile 2013 draft: 14 outbreaks in Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, New Zealand, Norway, Serbia, the United Kingdom and the United States; Salmonella caused 10 (87% of illnesses) and Bacillus spp. 4 (13%).

Chance that a test portion holds at least one cellp = 1 − e−c m (even mixing)
p = 1 − (1 + c m/k)−k (clumped)
Plot = 1 − (1 − p)n
Expected cells per test portion
Chance one portion is positive
Chance the lot tests positive
Portions needed for a 95% chance
Detection probability against contamination levelModel output

Shaded band: mean Salmonella concentrations of 6 × 10⁻⁴ to 0.09 MPN/g in contaminated imported capsicum shipments (FDA 2013 draft risk profile, Executive Summary).
Method, assumptions and limits
What it calculates
The probability that a presence/absence test finds a contaminant at a given mean concentration, for one or several test portions.
Equations
Poisson: p = 1 − exp(−c m). Gamma-Poisson (negative binomial) with dispersion k: p = 1 − (1 + c m/k)−k, which tends to the Poisson result as k grows. For n independent portions with no positives allowed: P = 1 − (1 − p)n.
Variables and units
c mean cfu per g; m grams per portion; n portions; k dimensionless (smaller is more clumped).
Assumptions
The method detects one living, culturable cell in the portion (a perfect test); portions are independent; the lot mean is constant.
Valid range
10⁻⁴ to 10 cfu/g; 1–60 portions.
What it does not establish
It does not model false negatives from inhibitory botanicals, injured or VBNC cells, or variation between lots. FDA found that a gamma-Poisson model fit its shipment data better than five other models, which is why clumping is offered; the k values here are illustrative, not FDA's fitted values.
References
FDA 2013 draft spice risk profile; EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, Guidance on microbiological criteria (2017); Gonzales-Barron, Zwietering and Butler (2013).
Verification
Checked against an independent Python implementation (scipy.stats.nbinom and poisson).
Explanation, details and sources

FDA tested imported spice shipments for fiscal years 2007–2009: 6.6% carried Salmonella (750 g tested; 95% CI 5.7–7.6%), against 3.4% for all other imported FDA-regulated foods. Fourteen spice-linked outbreaks from 1973 to 2010 caused 1,946 reported illnesses, 128 hospitalizations and two deaths. In contaminated capsicum shipments the mean concentration ranged from 6 × 10⁻⁴ to 0.09 MPN/g.

At the concentrations FDA measured, a single 10 g test is a weak screen. Confidence comes from testing more mass in more independent portions, and from a validated kill step that does not depend on finding the cells first. The calculator below shows the arithmetic.

Water activity

Below water activity 0.83 none of FDA's listed pathogens grows, but dry storage does not sterilize

Every listed pathogen needs aw of at least 0.83 to grow; xerophilic fungi push the floor near 0.6FDA guidance data
Growth limits of fifteen foodborne pathogens from FDA Table A-1: minimum water activity and the pH range for growthMinimum water activity for growthpH range for growthGrowth possible to the right of each markerBar spans minimum to maximum pH0.60.70.80.91.034567891011Xerophilic fungi germinate down to 0.650–0.605 (Stevenson et al. 2015)Staphylococcus aureus (growth)Staphylococcus aureus (growth): minimum aw 0.83 (salt as humectant)0.83Staphylococcus aureus (growth): pH 4 to 10S. aureus (toxin formation)S. aureus (toxin formation): minimum aw 0.85 (salt as humectant)0.85S. aureus (toxin formation): pH 4 to 9.8Bacillus cereusBacillus cereus: minimum aw 0.92 (salt as humectant)0.92Bacillus cereus: pH 4.3 to 9.3Listeria monocytogenesListeria monocytogenes: minimum aw 0.92 (salt as humectant)0.92Listeria monocytogenes: pH 4.4 to 9.4Clostridium perfringensClostridium perfringens: minimum aw 0.93 (salt as humectant)0.93Clostridium perfringens: pH 5 to 9C. botulinum type A, proteolytic B and FC. botulinum type A, proteolytic B and F: minimum aw 0.935 (salt as humectant)0.935C. botulinum type A, proteolytic B and F: pH 4.6 to 9Salmonella spp.Salmonella spp.: minimum aw 0.94 (salt as humectant)0.94Salmonella spp.: pH 3.7 to 9.5Vibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio parahaemolyticus: minimum aw 0.94 (salt as humectant)0.94Vibrio parahaemolyticus: pH 4.8 to 11Yersinia enterocoliticaYersinia enterocolitica: minimum aw 0.945 (salt as humectant)0.945Yersinia enterocolitica: pH 4.2 to 10Pathogenic Escherichia coliPathogenic Escherichia coli: minimum aw 0.95 (salt as humectant)0.95Pathogenic Escherichia coli: pH 4 to 10Shigella spp.Shigella spp.: minimum aw 0.96 (salt as humectant)0.96Shigella spp.: pH 4.8 to 9.3Vibrio vulnificusVibrio vulnificus: minimum aw 0.96 (salt as humectant)0.96Vibrio vulnificus: pH 5 to 10C. botulinum type E, nonproteolytic B and FC. botulinum type E, nonproteolytic B and F: minimum aw 0.97 (salt as humectant)0.97C. botulinum type E, nonproteolytic B and F: pH 5 to 9Vibrio choleraeVibrio cholerae: minimum aw 0.97 (salt as humectant)0.97Vibrio cholerae: pH 5 to 10Campylobacter jejuniCampylobacter jejuni: minimum aw 0.987 (salt as humectant)0.987Campylobacter jejuni: pH 4.9 to 9.5Water activity, awpHaw 0.85: FDA ITG 39 threshold for exemption from 21 CFR 108, 113 and 114Xerophilic fungi germinate at 0.605–0.650
Minimum aw values were measured with salt as the humectant; other solutes can shift them.FDA, Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance, Appendix 4, Table A-1; FDA Inspection Technical Guide No. 39, Water Activity (aw) in Foods (April 16, 1984); Stevenson et al., ISME J 2015;9:1333–1351.
Data table: FDA Table A-1 growth limits
Minimum water activity and pH range for pathogen growth
PathogenMin. awMin. pHMax. pHTemperature range, °C
Bacillus cereus0.924.39.34–55
Campylobacter jejuni0.9874.99.530–45
C. botulinum type A, proteolytic B and F0.9354.6910–48
C. botulinum type E, nonproteolytic B and F0.97593.3–45
Clostridium perfringens0.935910–52
Pathogenic E. coli0.954106.5–49.4
Listeria monocytogenes0.924.49.4−0.4–45
Salmonella spp.0.943.79.55.2–46.2
Shigella spp.0.964.89.36.1–47.1
Staphylococcus aureus, growth0.834107–50
S. aureus, toxin formation0.8549.810–48
Vibrio cholerae0.9751010–43
Vibrio parahaemolyticus0.944.8115–45.3
Vibrio vulnificus0.965108–43
Yersinia enterocolitica0.9454.210−1.3–42

FDA Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance, Appendix 4, Table A-1 (downloaded October 23, 2026). Xerophilic fungi: some germinate at 0.650–0.605, and mycelial growth limits near 0.65 were lowered to 0.640 by adjusting solutes (Stevenson et al. 2015). Drying and particle engineering covers how to measure aw and choose packaging.

Explanation, details and sources

Water activity (aw) is the vapor pressure of a material divided by that of pure water at the same temperature. It measures available water, which is different from moisture content. FDA's 1984 inspection guide notes that foods controlled to aw 0.85 or less are exempt from 21 CFR Parts 108, 113 and 114. A dried botanical well below 0.6 supports no microbial growth, yet Salmonella and spores already present can survive.

For a product decision, water activity controls growth during shelf life and is set by drying and packaging. It is not a kill step, so a dry botanical still needs counts and absence tests at release.

Spore formers

Spore formers survive drying and mild heat, so dried botanicals drift toward them

A dormant spore keeps a dry core behind cortex and coat, then germinates when nutrients returnSchematic
Bacterial endospore: the sporulation and germination cycle, the layered spore with its dry core, and why dried botanicals and microbial tests select for sporesVegetative cellGrows and dividesSporulationForespore forms inside themother cellFree sporeMother cell lysesDormancyCan last yearsGerminationNutrients trigger; core takesup waterOutgrowth back to a vegetative cellCoat and outer layersFirst barrier to chemicalsCortexThick peptidoglycan; brokendown at germinationInner membraneHolds the germinant receptorsCoreDNA saturated with SASPproteins; Ca-dipicolinic aciddepot; low waterDry botanicals shift toward spore formersUSP <2023>: in dried botanicals the flora changesfrom Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positivespore formers and fungiTests select spores with heatUSP <2022> and <62> heat one portion to 80 °Cfor 10 min before anaerobic cultureWet-heat resistance tracks core waterLower core water gives more wet-heat-resistantspores (Setlow 2006)Spores in spice outbreaksBacillus spp.: 4 of 14 spice-linked outbreaks, 13%of illnesses, 1973–2010 (FDA)
Setlow P, J Appl Microbiol 2006;101:514–525; Setlow P, J Bacteriol 2014;196:1297–1305; USP 38–NF 33 ⟨2022⟩, ⟨2023⟩, ⟨62⟩; FDA 2013 draft spice risk profile. Not to scale.
Text version of the spore figure

A vegetative cell forms a forespore, the mother cell lyses, and the free spore can stay dormant for years. Nutrient germinants act on receptors in the inner membrane; the core releases its dipicolinic acid, the cortex is degraded, and the core takes up water. The core holds DNA saturated with small acid-soluble proteins (SASP), which protect it. A lower core water content gives more wet-heat-resistant spores. Tests exploit this: ⟨2022⟩ and ⟨62⟩ heat one portion to 80 °C for 10 min before anaerobic culture. In the spice risk profile, Bacillus spp. caused 4 of 14 spice-linked outbreaks and 13% of illnesses.

Bacillus cereus spores lost 0.06–4.08 logs in a spray dryer, so drying is not a spore kill stepPublished data
Bacillus cereus spores: D-values in buffer at 90, 100 and 110 °C, and log reductions during spray drying in skim milk at outlet temperatures of 95 to 110 °CD-value in phosphate buffer0.1110100D, min (log scale)90100110Temperature, °CStrain 540Strain 540: 90, 17.7Strain 540: 100, 4.31Strain 540: 110, 0.62Strain B63Strain B63: 90, 35.6Strain B63: 100, 2.30Strain B63: 110, 0.67Strain 436Strain 436: 90, 23.0Strain 436: 100, 1.48Strain 436: 110, 0.30Strain 540Strain B63Strain 436Log reduction during spray drying (skim milk)012345Log reduction95 °C, Strain 540: 2.192.1995 °C, Strain B63: 2.452.4595 °C, Strain 436: 0.060.0695 °C105 °C, Strain 540: 2.212.21105 °C, Strain B63: 2.522.52105 °C, Strain 436: 1.011.01105 °C110 °C, Strain 540: 4.084.08110 °C, Strain B63: 2.762.76110 °C, Strain 436: 1.391.39110 °COutlet air temperature
Spray drying of skim milk; strains 540 (dairy), B63 (ready-to-eat meal) and 436 (chocolate).Alvarenga VO et al., Front Microbiol 2018;9:1113, Tables 1 and 2 (CC BY).
Data table: B. cereus spore D-values and spray-drying reductions
Bacillus cereus spore heat resistance
StrainD 90 °C, minD 100 °C, minD 110 °C, minLog reduction, outlet 95 / 105 / 110 °C
54017.714.310.622.19 / 2.21 / 4.08
B6335.642.300.672.45 / 2.52 / 2.76
43623.031.480.300.06 / 1.01 / 1.39

D-values in phosphate-buffered saline (Table 1); log reductions in skim milk at inlet 150, 170 and 190 °C (Table 2). Alvarenga et al. 2018.

Explanation, details and sources

Bacillus and Clostridium species can enclose a copy of their DNA in a dormant endospore. The spore's dry core helps it resist heat, radiation and many chemicals, and spores can stay dormant for years. USP ⟨2023⟩ notes that in dried botanicals the flora "will tend to change from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive spore formers and fungi".

Acid tolerance

A mild acid exposure can make Salmonella far harder to kill with strong acid

Adaptation needs new proteins; E. coli then spends protons on decarboxylation to keep its cytoplasm near neutralPublished evidence
Acid tolerance: Salmonella pre-exposed to pH 5.8 survives pH 3.3 100 to 1,000 times better, and E. coli consumes protons by decarboxylating glutamate or arginineSalmonella Typhimurium: adaptive acid toleranceFoster & Hall 1990UnadaptedpH 7.6GrowingculturepH 3.3Strong acidchallengeReferencesurvivalAdaptedpH 7.6GrowingculturepH 5.8One doublingin mild acidpH 3.3Strong acidchallenge100–1,000×more survivorsWhat the adaptation needsProtein synthesis (12 proteins induced, 6 repressed) and theproton-translocating ATPase. Acid-adapted cells also tolerated heat andsalt better in a later study (Leyer & Johnson 1993).E. coli: proton-consuming decarboxylase systemsOutside the cell: stomach pH 1–3; intestine pH 4.5–7GadA, GadBglutamate + H+​ → GABA + CO2​GadCGlutamate in,GABA outAdiAarginine + H+​ → agmatine + CO2​AdiCArginine in,agmatine outEach turn removes one H+​from the cytoplasmOnce induced, both systems stay active in cold storage at 4 °C (Linet al. 1996). Gene names: Li et al. 2024.
Foster JW, Hall HK, J Bacteriol 1990;172:771–778; Lin J et al., Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:3094–3100; Li Z et al., Microorganisms 2024;12:1774; Leyer GJ, Johnson EA, Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:1842–1847. Schematic, not to scale.
Text version of the acid tolerance figure

Foster and Hall grew Salmonella Typhimurium at pH 7.6, shifted it to pH 5.8 for one doubling, then challenged it at pH 3.3. Adapted cells were 100 to 1,000 times more resistant than unadapted cells. The response needed protein synthesis (12 proteins induced and 6 repressed) and the proton-translocating ATPase. The authors reported: “No cross protection was noted for hydrogen peroxide, SOS, or heat shock.” In E. coli, the glutamate system (GadA and GadB decarboxylases with the GadC antiporter) and the arginine system (AdiA with AdiC) each consume an intracellular proton per decarboxylation and export the product in exchange for fresh substrate. Lin et al. found that once induced, these systems remain active through prolonged cold storage at 4 °C.

Explanation, details and sources

Acidic botanical extracts and the stomach (pH 1–3) are both acid stresses. Bacteria that first meet mild acid switch on defenses. Salmonella shifted to pH 5.8 for one doubling survived a pH 3.3 challenge 100 to 1,000 times better than cells moved straight from pH 7.6. Acid-adapted Salmonella also tolerated heat and salt better in a separate study (Leyer and Johnson 1993).

For acidic extracts and beverages, acidity alone is a poor kill step. Cells that survive a mild acid stage can resist a stronger one, and the same exposure can raise their tolerance of heat and salt.

Biofilms

Biofilms shelter cells on equipment and can need far higher antimicrobial doses to remove

A biofilm forms in six stages, from a conditioning film to mature towers that shed cellsSchematic
Biofilm life cycle on a food-contact surface: conditioning film, reversible and irreversible attachment, microcolony, mature biofilm in an EPS matrix, and dispersalEPS matrixPolysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids andlipids hold cells to the surface (Flemming &Wingender 2010)ToleranceEradicating a biofilm often took 100–1,000× theplanktonic MIC of some antibiotics (Ceri et al.1999)MechanismsSlow growth, an rpoS-mediated stress responseand exclusion by the matrix (Mah & O'Toole 2001)1. Conditioning filmOrganic matter adsorbs2. ReversibleattachmentCells touch and leave3. IrreversibleattachmentCells start making EPS4. MicrocolonyCells divide in the matrix5. Mature biofilmTowers with waterchannels6. DispersalCells leave to colonizeWater channel
Flemming HC, Wingender J, Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8:623–633; Ceri H et al., J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:1771–1776; Mah TF, O'Toole GA, Trends Microbiol 2001;9:34–39; Costerton JW et al., Science 1999;284:1318–1322. Not to scale.
Text version of the biofilm figure

Stages: (1) organic matter adsorbs to the surface; (2) cells attach loosely and can leave; (3) cells attach firmly and begin making EPS; (4) a microcolony grows inside the matrix; (5) a mature biofilm forms towers separated by water channels; (6) cells disperse to colonize new sites. The matrix is mainly polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids and lipids. With the Calgary Biofilm Device, eradicating biofilms of reference strains often needed 100 to 1,000 times the concentration that inhibits planktonic cells, for some antibiotics. Proposed mechanisms include slow growth, an rpoS-mediated stress response and exclusion of biocides by the matrix.

Salmonella built biofilms about 100 times denser on plastic than on stainless steelPublished data
Salmonella biofilm density on three food-contact surfaces: highest on plastic, lowest on stainless steel (two poultry isolates)S. WeltevredenSalmonella FCM 40104​105​106​107​108​Cells in the biofilm, cfu/cm² (log scale)PlasticPlastic: 3.4e+07 cfu/cm²3.4 × 107​Plastic: 1.2e+07 cfu/cm²1.2 × 107​CementCement: 1.57e+06 cfu/cm²1.57 × 106​Cement: 4.96e+06 cfu/cm²4.96 × 106​Stainless steelStainless steel: 3e+05 cfu/cm²3 × 105​Stainless steel: 2.23e+05 cfu/cm²2.23 × 105​
Two poultry isolates. Biofilm cells resisted hypochlorite and iodophor better than planktonic cells in the same study.Joseph B et al., Int J Food Microbiol 2001;64:367–372.
Data table: Salmonella biofilm density by surface (cfu/cm²)
Salmonella biofilm density on three surfaces
SurfaceS. WeltevredenSalmonella FCM 40
Plastic3.4 × 10⁷1.2 × 10⁷
Cement1.57 × 10⁶4.96 × 10⁶
Stainless steel3 × 10⁵2.23 × 10⁵

Joseph et al. 2001, abstract.

Explanation, details and sources

A biofilm is a community of cells attached to a surface inside a self-made matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Biofilm cells are not usually removed by normal cleaning and can contaminate food that touches the surface. USP ⟨2023⟩ flags water systems and wet steps, such as wet granulation, liquid batching and film coating, as the problem areas.

Dormant and nonculturable cells

Some living cells form no colonies, so a clean plate is not proof of absence

Five of six cell states either need help to form a colony or form none at allSchematic
States a bacterial cell can occupy after stress, how it moves between them, and whether it forms a colony on a plateCulturable, growingForms colonies on routinemediaSublethally injuredMay fail on selective media until itrepairs (heat, chilling, acid)Viable but nonculturableNo colonies on routine media;membrane intact, ATP andtranscription continuePersisterDormant, non-dividing, tolerant;regrows laterDeadMembrane compromised; DNAcan persistEndosporeDormant spore of Bacillus orClostridium; germinates onmediaSublethal heat, chilling, acidRepair in nonselective brothStarvation, cold, light, oxidantsResuscitation: warmth,nutrients, Rpf proteinsSpontaneous switchProlonged stressSevere stressPlate: ColonyPlate: Colony after repairPlate: No colonyPlate: No colonyPlate: Colony, delayedPlate: Colony after germinationFormed by spore formers, in parallelStates a bacterial cell can occupy after stress and whether it forms a colonyPlate: ColonyCulturable, growingForms colonies on routine mediaPlate: Colony after repairSublethally injuredMay fail on selective media until it repairs (heat, chilling,acid)Plate: No colonyViable but nonculturableNo colonies on routine media; membrane intact, ATP andtranscription continuePlate: No colonyDeadMembrane compromised; DNA can persistPlate: Colony, delayedPersisterDormant, non-dividing, tolerant; regrows laterPlate: Colony after germinationEndosporeDormant spore of Bacillus or Clostridium; germinates onmedia
Li L et al., Front Microbiol 2014;5:258; Oliver JD, J Microbiol 2005;43:93–100; Oliver JD, FEMS Microbiol Rev 2010;34:415–425; Wesche AM et al., J Food Prot 2009;72:1121–1138; Balaban NQ et al., Science 2004;305:1622–1625; Lewis K, Nat Rev Microbiol 2007;5:48–56.
Text version of the cell-state figure
  • Culturable cells grow into colonies on routine media.
  • Sublethally injured cells result from heat, chilling, acid or alkali; they may need repair, for example in nonselective pre-enrichment broth, before growing on selective media.
  • VBNC cells arise after starvation, low temperature, light, oxidative stress or chlorination; milk pasteurization and wastewater chlorination can push a subpopulation into this state. VBNC cells keep intact membranes, respire and transcribe genes; Listeria monocytogenes kept high ATP a year after entering the state. Resuscitation stimuli include temperature upshift, nutrients and resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) proteins.
  • Persisters are dormant, non-dividing cells that tolerate antibiotics and regrow later; they arise by a spontaneous phenotypic switch.
  • Endospores are formed only by spore formers and germinate on media.
  • Dead cells have compromised membranes, but their DNA can persist and still be detected by PCR.
Explanation, details and sources

A plate count assumes that every living cell grows into a colony. Since 1982, researchers have shown that stressed bacteria can enter a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state: alive, still metabolizing, but silent on routine media. A 2014 review counted up to 85 species with this state, 67 of them pathogens. Resuscitation has been reported for 26 human-pathogen species.

A negative plate after a stress step such as drying, chlorinated water or acid can understate the survivors. Nonselective pre-enrichment lets injured cells repair, and a viability-based molecular method such as PMA–qPCR reports cells whose membranes are intact, including VBNC cells.

Rapid and molecular methods

Each method sees a different slice of the population, so laboratories combine them

No single method sees every state; culture and DNA methods fail in opposite directionsSynthesis of sources
Which method sees which cell state: plate counts miss VBNC cells, DNA methods also count dead cells, ATP misses dormant sporesCulturable cellsInjured cellsVBNC cellsDormant sporesExcludes deadcellsNames thespeciesPlate count, USP <2021> or <61>Plate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · Culturable cells: highPlate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · Injured cells: mediumPlate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · VBNC cells: lowPlate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · Dormant spores: highPlate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · Excludes dead cells: highPlate count, USP ⟨2021⟩ or ⟨61⟩ · Names the species: lowEnrichment, USP <2022> or BAMEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · Culturable cells: highEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · Injured cells: highEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · VBNC cells: mediumEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · Dormant spores: mediumEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · Excludes dead cells: highEnrichment, USP ⟨2022⟩ or BAM · Names the species: mediumqPCR on DNAqPCR on DNA · Culturable cells: highqPCR on DNA · Injured cells: highqPCR on DNA · VBNC cells: highqPCR on DNA · Dormant spores: mediumqPCR on DNA · Excludes dead cells: lowqPCR on DNA · Names the species: highPMA–qPCR (viability PCR)PMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · Culturable cells: highPMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · Injured cells: mediumPMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · VBNC cells: highPMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · Dormant spores: mediumPMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · Excludes dead cells: highPMA–qPCR (viability PCR) · Names the species: highFlow cytometry, live/dead stainsFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · Culturable cells: highFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · Injured cells: mediumFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · VBNC cells: highFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · Dormant spores: mediumFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · Excludes dead cells: highFlow cytometry, live/dead stains · Names the species: lowATP bioluminescenceATP bioluminescence · Culturable cells: highATP bioluminescence · Injured cells: mediumATP bioluminescence · VBNC cells: highATP bioluminescence · Dormant spores: lowATP bioluminescence · Excludes dead cells: mediumATP bioluminescence · Names the species: lowMALDI-TOF MS on isolatesMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · Culturable cells: highMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · Injured cells: mediumMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · VBNC cells: lowMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · Dormant spores: mediumMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · Excludes dead cells: highMALDI-TOF MS on isolates · Names the species: high16S rRNA gene sequencing16S rRNA gene sequencing · Culturable cells: high16S rRNA gene sequencing · Injured cells: high16S rRNA gene sequencing · VBNC cells: high16S rRNA gene sequencing · Dormant spores: medium16S rRNA gene sequencing · Excludes dead cells: low16S rRNA gene sequencing · Names the species: mediumYes, by designPartly, or with an added stepNo
Ratings are EUTECNIQ's reading of the method principles in the cited reviews, for teaching; they are not validation data.Emerson JB et al., Microbiome 2017;5:86 (Table 1); Nocker A et al., J Microbiol Methods 2006;67:310–320; Berney M et al., Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:3283–3290; Li L et al. 2014; Singhal N et al., Front Microbiol 2015;6:791; Janda JM, Abbott SL, J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2761–2764.
Text version: why each method is rated as it is
  • Plate count: counts only cells that form colonies; spores germinate on the medium; no identity.
  • Enrichment culture: nonselective pre-enrichment lets injured cells repair; some VBNC cells resuscitate in rich media; confirmation names only the target organism.
  • qPCR on DNA: detects DNA from living, VBNC and dead cells alike; species-specific by primer design.
  • PMA–qPCR: PMA penetrates cells with compromised membranes and removes their DNA from analysis, so intact VBNC cells still score; injured cells with damaged membranes may drop out.
  • Flow cytometry with live/dead stains: separates intact from damaged membranes, with intermediate states; no species identity without added probes.
  • ATP bioluminescence: tracks metabolically active cells and is rapid, but extracellular ATP inflates results, dormant spores are not detected, and it has no specificity.
  • MALDI-TOF MS: identifies colonies already grown, if the spectral database contains the species.
  • 16S rRNA gene sequencing: identifies DNA from any cell state; resolution below genus varies.

USP–NF 2025, Issue 2, includes chapters on respiration-based ⟨72⟩ and ATP bioluminescence-based ⟨73⟩ methods for detecting contamination in short-life products, with ⟨1071⟩ as the risk-based companion (USP–NF 2025 Issue 2 commentary, February 3, 2025).

Explanation, details and sources

USP ⟨2021⟩ allows alternative methods "provided that they have been properly validated as giving equivalent or better results". DNA methods are fast and specific but also count dead cells. Propidium monoazide (PMA) enters only membrane-damaged cells and blocks their DNA, so PMA–qPCR reports cells with intact membranes. ATP methods miss dormant spores.

Kill steps

Kill steps are designed from D, z and F values measured in the real, dry matrix

Log-linear survival and the Bigelow modellog10 N = log10 N0 − tD(T), D(T) = Dref · 10(Tref − T)/z, F = ∫ 10(T(t) − Tref)/z dt
At 65 °C a 5-log kill of Salmonella takes about 4 minutes on moist chili and about 150 minutes on dry chiliPublished D-values
Survival at 65 °C on a log scale: a 5-log reduction takes about 4 minutes for Salmonella on chili at aw 0.97 and about 150 minutes at aw 0.33-10123456log N, cfu/g (N₀ = 10⁶)020406080100120140160Time at 65 °C, min5-log reduction (N = 10 cfu/g)Salmonella on chili, aw 0.97: D = 0.72 min at 65 °CSalmonella on chili, aw 0.97: 5-log at 3.6 minSalmonella on chili, aw 0.50: D = 6.78 min at 65 °CSalmonella on chili, aw 0.50: 5-log at 33.9 minSalmonella on chili, aw 0.33: D = 30.24 min at 65 °CSalmonella on chili, aw 0.33: 5-log at 151.2 minL. monocytogenes, moist food: D = 1.55 min at 65 °CL. monocytogenes, moist food: 5-log at 7.8 minD at 65 °C · time for 5 logsSalmonella on chili, aw 0.97D 0.72 min · 3.6 minSalmonella on chili, aw 0.50D 6.78 min · 34 minSalmonella on chili, aw 0.33D 30.24 min · 151 minL. monocytogenes, moist foodD 1.55 min · 7.8 min
Straight lines are the log-linear model the authors fitted; points mark 5 logs. Listeria D at 65 °C is FDA's 6D time of 9.3 min divided by 6.Faliarizao NT et al., J Food Sci 2025;90:e70201, Table 1 (isothermal; CC BY); FDA Fish and Fishery Products guidance, Appendix 4, Table A-3.
Data table: D-values at 65 °C and time for a 5-log reduction
D-values at 65 degrees Celsius
Organism and matrixD at 65 °C, min (95% CI)5-log time, min
Salmonella Montevideo, chili pepper, aw 0.970.72 (0.54–0.90)3.6
Salmonella Montevideo, chili pepper, aw 0.506.78 (5.63–7.92)34
Salmonella Montevideo, chili pepper, aw 0.3330.24 (25.72–34.74)151
L. monocytogenes, moist food (FDA)1.55 (from a 6D time of 9.3 min)7.8
Lower water activity and lower temperature together raise D more than 400-fold across the tested rangePublished model
Modeled D-value of Salmonella Montevideo on dried chili pepper across water activity 0.33 to 0.97 and 55 to 70 °C: lower water activity and lower temperature raise D more than 400-foldWater activityTreatment temperature55 °C57.5 °C60 °C62.5 °C65 °C67.5 °C70 °Caw 0.97aw 0.97, 55 °C: model D = 2.8 min; measured 2.22 min2.8aw 0.97, 57.5 °C: model D = 2.0 min2.0aw 0.97, 60 °C: model D = 1.4 min; measured 1.05 min1.4aw 0.97, 62.5 °C: model D = 0.96 min0.96aw 0.97, 65 °C: model D = 0.68 min; measured 0.5 min0.68aw 0.97, 67.5 °C: model D = 0.48 min0.48aw 0.97, 70 °C: model D = 0.33 min0.33aw 0.90aw 0.90, 55 °C: model D = 4.3 min4.3aw 0.90, 57.5 °C: model D = 3.0 min3.0aw 0.90, 60 °C: model D = 2.1 min2.1aw 0.90, 62.5 °C: model D = 1.5 min1.5aw 0.90, 65 °C: model D = 1.0 min1.0aw 0.90, 67.5 °C: model D = 0.73 min0.73aw 0.90, 70 °C: model D = 0.51 min0.51aw 0.80aw 0.80, 55 °C: model D = 7.8 min7.8aw 0.80, 57.5 °C: model D = 5.5 min5.5aw 0.80, 60 °C: model D = 3.9 min3.9aw 0.80, 62.5 °C: model D = 2.7 min2.7aw 0.80, 65 °C: model D = 1.9 min1.9aw 0.80, 67.5 °C: model D = 1.3 min1.3aw 0.80, 70 °C: model D = 0.93 min0.93aw 0.70aw 0.70, 55 °C: model D = 14 min14aw 0.70, 57.5 °C: model D = 10 min10aw 0.70, 60 °C: model D = 7.1 min7.1aw 0.70, 62.5 °C: model D = 5.0 min5.0aw 0.70, 65 °C: model D = 3.5 min3.5aw 0.70, 67.5 °C: model D = 2.4 min2.4aw 0.70, 70 °C: model D = 1.7 min1.7aw 0.60aw 0.60, 55 °C: model D = 26 min26aw 0.60, 57.5 °C: model D = 18 min18aw 0.60, 60 °C: model D = 13 min13aw 0.60, 62.5 °C: model D = 9.1 min9.1aw 0.60, 65 °C: model D = 6.4 min6.4aw 0.60, 67.5 °C: model D = 4.5 min4.5aw 0.60, 70 °C: model D = 3.1 min3.1aw 0.50aw 0.50, 55 °C: model D = 48 min48aw 0.50, 57.5 °C: model D = 34 min34aw 0.50, 60 °C: model D = 24 min; measured 13.57 min24aw 0.50, 62.5 °C: model D = 17 min17aw 0.50, 65 °C: model D = 12 min; measured 7.16 min12aw 0.50, 67.5 °C: model D = 8.2 min8.2aw 0.50, 70 °C: model D = 5.8 min; measured 3.78 min5.8aw 0.40aw 0.40, 55 °C: model D = 88 min88aw 0.40, 57.5 °C: model D = 62 min62aw 0.40, 60 °C: model D = 43 min43aw 0.40, 62.5 °C: model D = 31 min31aw 0.40, 65 °C: model D = 21 min21aw 0.40, 67.5 °C: model D = 15 min15aw 0.40, 70 °C: model D = 11 min11aw 0.33aw 0.33, 55 °C: model D = 135 min135aw 0.33, 57.5 °C: model D = 95 min95aw 0.33, 60 °C: model D = 66 min; measured 88.11 min66aw 0.33, 62.5 °C: model D = 47 min47aw 0.33, 65 °C: model D = 33 min; measured 36.24 min33aw 0.33, 67.5 °C: model D = 23 min23aw 0.33, 70 °C: model D = 16 min; measured 14.91 min16Measured: 2.22 minMeasured: 1.05 minMeasured: 0.5 minMeasured: 13.57 minMeasured: 7.16 minMeasured: 3.78 minMeasured: 88.11 minMeasured: 36.24 minMeasured: 14.91 minD-value, min (log scale)0.30150Cell also measured (Table 2)Model inputsD = 16.11 min at 70 °C, aw 0.33zT​ = 16.25 °C; zaw​ = 0.38Valid range: 55–70 °C,aw 0.33–0.97Each cell: minutes for a tenfold (1-log) reduction at that condition
Model: D = Dref·10(70 − T)/zT·10(0.33 − aw)/zaw with the authors' dynamic-condition fit. The model is a compromise across all data: at aw 0.50 and 60 °C it gives 24 min where 13.57 min was measured.Faliarizao NT et al., J Food Sci 2025;90:e70201, Tables 2 and 3 (CC BY).
Data table: measured and modeled D-values, Salmonella Montevideo on dried chili pepper
Measured D-values under dynamic conditions
awTemperature, °CMeasured D, min (95% CI)Model D, min
0.336088.11 (67.86–108.36)66
0.336536.24 (31.94–40.54)33
0.337014.91 (13.29–16.52)16
0.506013.57 (10.80–16.34)24
0.50657.16 (6.24–8.08)12
0.50703.78 (3.10–4.46)5.8
0.97552.22 (1.76–2.67)2.8
0.97601.05 (0.94–1.16)1.4
0.97650.50 (0.40–0.59)0.68

Measured: Table 2 (dynamic conditions). Model parameters: Table 3, dynamic fit, D70 °C = 16.11 min at aw 0.33, zT = 16.25 °C, zaw = 0.38 (reference aw 0.33). The isothermal fit gives D70 °C = 17.61 min, zT = 24.03 °C and zaw = 0.44.

Process lethalityF = ∫ L(T) dt, L = 10(T − Tref)/z
log reduction = F / Dref
D at the hold temperature
F-value, equivalent minutes at Tref
Log reduction delivered
Expected survivors
Hold time for the target

Temperature and surviving population over the processModel output

Listeria: D70 °C = 2.0/6 min, z = 7.5 °C (FDA Table A-3). C. botulinum type B: D90 °C = 10/6 min, z = 7.0 °C below 90 °C and 10 °C above (FDA Table A-4). Salmonella on chili: D70 °C = 16.11 min at aw 0.33, zT = 16.25 °C, zaw = 0.38 (Faliarizao et al. 2025).
Method, assumptions and limits
What it calculates
The lethality of a heat step with a linear come-up from 25 °C and an isothermal hold, the log reduction it delivers, the expected survivors and the hold time needed for a target log reduction.
Equations
Lethal rate L(T) = 10(T − Tref)/z; F = ∫L dt, with Simpson's rule over the come-up (400 intervals) and L·t over the hold; log reduction = F/Dref; required hold = (target × Dref − Fcome-up)/L(T). For the chili model, Dref is multiplied by 10(0.33 − aw)/0.38. For C. botulinum, z is 7.0 °C below 90 °C and 10 °C at or above it, as in FDA Table A-4.
Variables and units
T in °C; times in min; D in min; F in min at Tref (70 °C for Listeria and Salmonella, 90 °C for C. botulinum); counts in log10 cfu/g.
Assumptions
First-order (log-linear) inactivation; the product temperature equals the set profile everywhere; water activity stays constant during heating; cooling adds no lethality.
Valid range
Source data cover 63–85 °C (Listeria), 85–100 °C (C. botulinum) and 55–70 °C with aw 0.33–0.97 (Salmonella on chili). Outside these ranges the calculator warns that it is extrapolating.
What it does not establish
It is not a validated process. Real products have cold spots, tails and shoulders on survival curves, and changing water activity during heating; a kill step must be validated in the actual product and equipment.
References
FDA Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance, Appendix 4, Tables A-3 and A-4; Faliarizao et al. 2025.
Verification
An independent Python solution (scipy.integrate.quad) reproduces the readouts and FDA's tabulated values: 6D at 70 °C in 2.0 min and at 63 °C in 17.0 min for Listeria; lethal rate 0.193 and 6D in 51.8 min at 85 °C for C. botulinum.
Explanation, details and sources

The D-value is the time at a set temperature that kills 90% of a population, one log. The z-value is the temperature rise that cuts D tenfold. The F-value adds up the lethality of a whole time–temperature profile as equivalent minutes at a reference temperature.

The design rule follows from the data. Validate a kill step at the water activity the product has while it is heated, and measure the come-up, because lethality that is not recorded cannot be credited.

Steam, dry heat, irradiation, ethylene oxide

Irradiation and ethylene oxide are limited by use, dose and residue rules; heat steps by validation

Four treatments, four different limits, as of October 2026Regulation
Four kill steps for botanicals compared by mechanism, limits, published effect and U.S. rule as of October 2026Steam (moist heat)Condensing steam heats andwets the surface, raising localwater activitySpores need far more heat;heat-sensitive actives maydegradeSalmonella on chili at 65 °C: D0.72 min at aw 0.97USP <2023>: “All processeshave to be validated”Dry heatHot air on a dry productLow water activity raisesD-values; USP <2023> warnsof degradationSame chili at 65 °C: D 30 minat aw 0.33USP <2023>: “All processeshave to be validated”Ionizing radiationGamma rays, electrons orX-rays damage DNALimited to listed uses anddoses; retail labeling with theraduraS. Montevideo in pepper andsesame: 3 kGy, 3–4 logs; 5kGy, 5.5–6 logs21 CFR 179.26: up to 30 kGyfor culinary herbs, seeds andspices used solely for flavor oraromaEthylene oxideGas fumigationResidues of EtO and2-chloroethanol; alkaloidlosses reported (USP <2023>)Used on about 30% of driedherbs and spices (EPA, 2025)Tolerances: 7 ppm EtO, 940ppm 2-chloroethanol (40 CFR180.151). EPA’s January 2025Interim Decision cancels someherb and spice usesHow it killsWhat limits itPublished effectRule or standardFour kill steps for botanicals comparedSteam (moist heat)How it kills: Condensing steam heats and wets thesurface, raising local water activityWhat limits it: Spores need far more heat; heat-sensitiveactives may degradePublished effect: Salmonella on chili at 65 °C: D 0.72 minat aw 0.97Rule or standard: USP <2023>: “All processes have to bevalidated”Dry heatHow it kills: Hot air on a dry productWhat limits it: Low water activity raises D-values; USP<2023> warns of degradationPublished effect: Same chili at 65 °C: D 30 min at aw0.33Rule or standard: USP <2023>: “All processes have to bevalidated”Ionizing radiationHow it kills: Gamma rays, electrons or X-rays damageDNAWhat limits it: Limited to listed uses and doses; retaillabeling with the raduraPublished effect: S. Montevideo in pepper and sesame: 3kGy, 3–4 logs; 5 kGy, 5.5–6 logsRule or standard: 21 CFR 179.26: up to 30 kGy forculinary herbs, seeds and spices used solely for flavor oraromaEthylene oxideHow it kills: Gas fumigationWhat limits it: Residues of EtO and 2-chloroethanol;alkaloid losses reported (USP <2023>)Published effect: Used on about 30% of dried herbs andspices (EPA, 2025)Rule or standard: Tolerances: 7 ppm EtO, 940 ppm2-chloroethanol (40 CFR 180.151). EPA’s January 2025Interim Decision cancels some herb and spice uses
21 CFR 179.26 (eCFR, current October 2026); 40 CFR 180.151; EPA news release, Interim Decision for Ethylene Oxide (January 14, 2025); European Commission, summary record of the Food and Feed Crisis Coordinators meeting of October 9, 2020; D'Oca MC et al., Ital J Food Saf 2021;10:8914; USP 38–NF 33 ⟨2023⟩; Faliarizao et al. 2025.
Text version of the treatment comparison
  • Steam. Moist heat; the wet surface raises local water activity, which lowers D. Salmonella on chili at 65 °C: D 0.72 min at aw 0.97. Spores need far more heat.
  • Dry heat. At aw 0.33 the same Salmonella had D 30 min at 65 °C. USP ⟨2023⟩ notes dry heat "may adversely affect stability and degradation of the raw material".
  • Irradiation. 21 CFR 179.26 permits up to 30 kGy for microbial disinfection of dry or dehydrated aromatic vegetable substances "when used as ingredients in small amounts solely for flavoring or aroma" (culinary herbs, seeds, spices, vegetable seasonings and blends; turmeric and paprika also as color additives), and up to 10 kGy for dry enzyme preparations. Retail packages carry the radura logo and "Treated with radiation" or "Treated by irradiation". Gamma irradiation of S. Montevideo in black pepper and sesame gave 3–4 logs at 3 kGy and 5.5–6 logs at 5 kGy.
  • Ethylene oxide. EPA tolerances (40 CFR 180.151): 7 ppm ethylene oxide and 940 ppm 2-chloroethanol in dried herbs and spices (except basil), licorice roots, dried peppermint and spearmint tops, sesame seed and dried vegetables. EPA's January 14, 2025 Interim Decision cancels use on specific dried herbs and spices where it is not critical, phases out others where alternatives exist, and notes use on about 30% of dried herbs and spices.

Whether a botanical used in a dietary supplement fits the 179.26 condition "in small amounts solely for flavoring or aroma" is a question for regulatory counsel.

Explanation, details and sources

Each treatment trades kill against product damage and regulatory limits. USP ⟨2023⟩ warns that irradiation and ethylene oxide "may cause unwanted changes" and that crude extracts with alkaloids have lost alkaloid content after ethylene oxide treatment. In the EU, sesame seeds must meet an ethylene oxide limit of 0.05 mg/kg, set at the limit of quantification; a 2020 Indian sesame incident led to withdrawals in member states.

Key terms

Twelve terms carry most of microbial quality control

Show the 12 key terms
cfu
Colony-forming unit: a cell or clump that grows into one colony.
TAMC and TYMC
Total aerobic count; total yeast and mold count.
Specified microorganism
A named organism that must be absent in a stated mass.
Method suitability
Proof that the test recovers spiked organisms from the product.
Water activity (aw)
Vapor pressure of a material over that of pure water.
D-value
Minutes at one temperature for a tenfold reduction.
z-value
Temperature rise that cuts the D-value tenfold.
F-value
Lethality of a heat profile, in minutes at a reference temperature.
Endospore
Dormant, heat-resistant form of Bacillus and Clostridium.
Sublethal injury
Damage a cell survives but must repair before growing on selective media.
VBNC
Viable but nonculturable: alive, yet forming no colonies on routine media.
Biofilm
Surface-attached cells inside a self-made polymer matrix (EPS).
Check your understanding

Six questions test the main ideas

A dried root powder has TAMC 6 × 10⁴ cfu/g and TYMC 5 × 10² cfu/g. Does it meet the USP ⟨2023⟩ recommendation for dried or powdered botanicals?

Yes for both counts: the recommendations are 10⁵ and 10³ cfu/g. It must also show no Salmonella or E. coli in 10 g and bile-tolerant Gram-negative bacteria of no more than 10³ cfu/g.

A lot carries Salmonella evenly at 0.01 cfu/g and tests "absent in 10 g". How likely was that result?

About 90%. The portion is expected to hold 0.1 cell, so the chance it holds one or more is 1 − e−0.1 ≈ 9.5%. Thirty such portions are needed for a 95% chance of detection.

Why does FDA's method test cloves at a 1:1000 dilution?

Cloves inhibit Salmonella in the broth, and FDA knows of no neutralizer for them. Dilution takes the spice below its inhibitory level so that any Salmonella present can grow.

Why is a heat step that works for a wet extract weak for a dry powder?

Low water activity raises the D-value. For Salmonella on chili at 65 °C, D rose from 0.72 min at aw 0.97 to 30 min at aw 0.33, so the same time gives about 40 times less kill.

A qPCR test is positive for Salmonella, but culture is negative. Name two explanations.

The DNA may come from dead cells, which PCR still detects, or from viable but nonculturable cells that culture misses. PMA–qPCR helps separate the two because it excludes cells with damaged membranes.

Does 21 CFR 179.26 allow 30 kGy for any dried botanical ingredient?

No. The 30 kGy use covers dry or dehydrated aromatic vegetable substances "used as ingredients in small amounts solely for flavoring or aroma", with turmeric and paprika also allowed as color additives. Other uses need their own authorization or counsel's review.

Next: how pH and solubility shape what the body absorbs

Course 8 follows a botanical compound from the stomach to the bloodstream.